Ceftriaxone–Sulbactam–EDTA Effective Against MDR Gram-Negative ICU Infections
calendar
26 Jun, 23

Introduction

 

India is facing an increasing threat with a rise in multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial strains. An increase in carbapenem resistance and colistin associated toxicity in intensive care units (ICUs), has led to a need for carbapenem-sparing drugs to combat the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and metallo-beta-lactamse (MBL)-producing pathogens.

 

Aim

 

To assess the efficacy of ceftriaxone–sulbactam–EDTA (CSE) combination in MDR gram-negative bacteria (ESBL-producing) versus other carbapenems (meropenem/ertapenem/imipenem) as well as colistin (MBL-producing bacteria).

 

Sample Profile 

  •  

  • 1,877 gram-negative bacterial isolates from 2,760 clinical samples of blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), respiratory samples, tissue and pus collected from intensive care units (ICUs) patients for routine cultures over 9 months were evaluated

 

Method

 

Study Design

  •  

  • Comparative in vitro sensitivity study

 

Endpoints

  •  

  • Susceptibility patterns of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter spp., and Pseudomonas spp. along with ESBL and MBL producers for different antimicrobials 

 

Results 

 

Efficacy

  •  

  • CSE confirmed maximum antibiotic effectiveness with 94% sensitivity for carbapenem-sensitive Enterobacteriaceae and 97% for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas spp. (Figure 1)

  • Colistin was most effective (95% sensitivity) in both the Enterobacteriaceae and non-Enterobacteriaceae group

  • CSE showed superior efficacy (95%) versus colistin (89%) towards Enterobacteriaceae 

  • Among MBL producers, CSE showed 90% sensitivity toward Enterobacteriaceae, 96% toward Acinetobacter spp., and 94% toward Pseudomonas spp. and colistin showed intermediate sensitivity as 84, 93 and 96% to the above isolates, respectively

  • At 31% sensitivity, imipenem was most effective carbapenem against Enterobacteriaceae, and ertapenem had least effect.

  • None of the isolates of A. baumannii were resistant to CSE, whereas 6, 8, and 3% isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa, respectively, were resistant to CSE

  • CSE and colistin were effective in 100% of the Acinetobacter group isolates

 

Figure 1: Susceptibility Pattern of Pathogens for CSE Combination Therapy

 

 

Conclusion 

  •  

  • CSE showed significant effectiveness against MDR gram-negative infections (ESBL and MBL producers), especially in ICU

  • This study strongly recommends CSE as a carbapenem- and colistin-sparing antibiotic

 

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020; 24(12): 1213-1217