Safety and Efficacy of a Short-term versus High-dose LVFX Regimen for the Treatment of Patients with cUTI or APN
calendar
23 Dec, 20

Introduction

Levofloxacin (LVFX) is a quinolone, widely used to treat complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (APN). The duration of LVFX therapy is essential for improving efficacy and reducing the development of resistance. Thus, short-term therapy with LVFX at a high dose (750 mg/day for 5 days) may be preferable to more prolonged treatment with a lower dose.

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety of short-course intravenous levofloxacin (LVFX) 750 mg with a conventional intravenous/oral regimen of LVFX 500 mg in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and acute pyelonephritis (APN)

Patient profile

  • Patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and acute pyelonephritis (APN)

Methods

  • Prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority clinical trial
  • Patients with cUTI and APN were randomly assigned to a short-course therapy group or a conventional therapy group

  • Drug Regimen
    • Short-course therapy group: Patients in the LVFX 750-mg group received an intravenous infusion of LVFX (750 mg/150 mL) once daily for 5 consecutive days.
    • Conventional therapy group: Patients in the LVFX 500-mg group received an intravenous infusion of LVFX (500 mg/100 mL) once daily and were then shifted to an oral regimen of LVFX (500 mg/ tablet) once daily for 7–14 days
  • The clinical, laboratory and microbiological results were evaluated for efficacy and safety

Results

 Table 1: Baseline characteristics

Variable

LVFX 500 mg

(N = 159)

LVFX 750 mg

(N = 158)

p-value

Age (years), mean ± SD

50.18 ± 17.42

49.08 ± 17.37

0.574

Sex

 

 

0.512

Male

22 (13.84%)

18 (11.39%)

 

Female

137 (86.16%)

140 (88.61%)

 

Height (cm), mean ± SD

160.78 ± 6.08

161.17 ± 6.07

0.572

Weight (kg), mean ± SD

59.68 ± 9.74

60.65 ± 10.76

0.404

History of allergies

20 (12.58%)

16 (10.13%)

0.491

Diagnostic result

 

 

0.697

cUTI

90 (56.6%)

86 (54.43%)

 

APN

69 (43.4%)

72 (45.57%)

 

Source

 

 

0.593

Inpatients

96 (60.38%)

100 (63.29%)

 

Outpatients

63 (39.62%)

58 (36.71%)

 

Treatment time (days), median

9

5

<0.001

Exposure dose (mg), median

4500

3750

<0.001

Clinical Efficacy

  • Clinical effectiveness in the short-course therapy group was non-inferior to that in the conventional therapy group
    • In both the LVFX 500-mg group and the LVFX 750-mg group, the clinical success rates were significantly better for APN than for cUTI
  • The microbiological effectiveness rates were also similar between short-course therapy and conventional therapy
    • In the LVFX 500-mg group, the microbiologic eradication rate was significantly higher for APN than for cUTI (100 %versus 72.97%, p = 0.003), but not in the LVFX 750-mg group (91.67% verses 87.10% p > 0.05)
  • The median clinical success time was 4 days in the LVFX 500-mg group and 3 days in the LVFX 750-mg group (p > 0.05)
Figure 1: Clinical success rates and microbiological eradication rates with LVFX 500 mg regimen and the LVFX 750 mg regimen

Safety Analysis

  • The incidence of adverse effects and drug-related adverse effects were also similar for the short-course therapy group and the conventional therapy group
  • The total adverse event rate in the LVFX 500-mg group was 23.03% and 21.95% in the LVFX 750-mg group (p > 0.05)
Table 2: Adverse events among patients in the LVFX 500-mg group and the LVFX 750-mg group

 

LVFX 500 mg

(N = 165)

LVFX 750 mg

(N = 164)

 

 

 

N (incidence)

N

(case-time)

N (incidence)

N

(case-time)

 p value

Total

38 (23.03%)

52

36 (21.95%)

57

0.792

Related to drugs

26 (15.76%)

36

31 (18.90%)

46

0.071

Severe

2 (1.21%)

2

1 (0.61%)

1

1.000

Resulting in loss to follow-up*

10 (6.06%)

10

11 (6.71%)

15

0.686

Examinations

16 (9.70%)

17

14 (8.54%)

17

0.702

Reduction in leukocyte count

9 (5.45%)

9

9 (5.49%)

9

1.000

Reduction in neutrophil count

2 (1.21%)

2

3 (1.83%)

3

1.000

Increased ALT

2 (1.21%)

2

2 (1.22%)

2

1.000

Increased ASP

2 (1.21%)

2

3 (1.83%)

2

1.000

Increased platelet count

2 (1.21%)

2

0 (0%)

0

0.489

Increased blood pressure

0 (0%)

0

1 (0.61%)

1

1.000

Gastrointestinal

4 (2.42%)

6

7 (4.27%)

10

0.358

Reaction at injection site

7 (4.24%)

9

3 (1.83%)

4

0.199

Cutaneous/subcutaneous

3 (1.82%)

2

3 (1.83%)

3

1.000

Nervous system/mental

1 (0.61%)

0

4 (2.44%)

7

0.371

Immune

1 (0.61%)

1

1 (0.61%)

1

1.000

Infection

7 (4.24%)

1

1 (0.61%)

1

0.067

Hepatobiliary

0 (0%)

0

1 (0.61%)

1

1.000

Metabolic/nutritional

1 (0.61%)

0

3 (1.83%)

1

0.623

Musculoskeletal/connective tissue

0 (0%)

0

1 (0.61%)

1

1.000

Conclusion

  • The study demonstrated that patients with cUTIs and APN who were given short-course LVFX therapy and conventional LVFX therapy had similar outcomes in clinical and microbiological efficacy, tolerance, and safety
  • The LVFX 750 mg regimen may be preferred for the treatment of these infections because its duration was 50% less, and the total drug dose was 23% less

Reference

Int Urol Nephrol. 2017. 49:499–507