Terbinafine versus Itraconazole in Treatment of Dermatophytic Infection of Skin
calendar
29 Jun, 20

Introduction

Terbinafine and itraconazole are commonly used oral antifungals for dermatophytic infections. Widespread resistance to conventional doses of antifungals with increasing clinical failure rates warrants the search for an effective first?line antifungal drug that brings about rapid clinical and mycological cure in tinea corporis and tinea cruris

Aim

To compare the efficacy of oral terbinafine versus itraconazole in the treatment of tinea corporis and tinea cruris

Patient Profile

Patients of both genders aged 18 years and above with clinical diagnosis of tinea corporis and tinea cruris confirmed by potassium hydroxide (KOH) test

Methods

  • Randomized comparative study

Assessments

  • At each visit, clinical response was noted, including pruritus, erythema, and scaling. These were rated as clinical score 0–3, 0 – absent, 1 – mild, 2 – moderate, and 3 – severe
  • Global clinical evaluation was done, and the response was noted accordingly as healed, marked improvement, considerable residual lesions (>50%), no change, or worse
  • Monitoring of signs and symptoms for any adverse cardiac event was done at each visit
  • Patients were considered cured when there was an absence of scaling, erythema, and pruritus, and KOH was also negative

Results

Table 1: Baseline characteristics

Parameters

Group 1

Terbinafine

(n=160)

Group 2

Itraconazole

(n=160)

Age (mean±SD)

34.97±14.123

34.78±13.039

Gender, n (%)

 

 

Male

103 (32.3)

107 (33.5)

Female

56 (17.6)

53 (16.6)

Diagnosis

 

 

Tinea cruris

11 (3.4)

7 (2.2)

Tinea corporis

10 (3.1)

5 (1.6)

Tinea cruris et corporis

129 (40.3)

135 (42.2)

Tinea cruris et corporis with faciei

10 (3.1)

13 (4.1)

No statistically significant difference in the above parameters. SD=Standard

deviation

Figure 1: Mycological cure rates at the end of week 4  

  • The global clinical response at the end of 4 weeks was significantly better in the itraconazole group as compared to the terbinafine group.
    • More patients in Group II were in the healed category as compared to Group I (46% vs 37%).
    • Only a few patients worsened in the itraconazole group (Group I) as compared to the terbinafine group (Group II) (4.1% vs 12.2%)
  • At the end of 4 weeks, there was a statistically significant improvement in erythema, scaling, and pruritus scores in Group I as well as in Group II
Table 2: Percentage change in clinical parameters in both the groups

Parameters

Mean±SD (%)

P values

between groups

Group 1

(n=160)

Group 2

(n=160)

Pruritus

 

 

 

Baseline to 2 weeks

21.7±30.4

19.8±24.8

0.637

2 weeks to 4 weeks

24.0±31.3

31.3±23.3*

0.028

Baseline to 4 weeks

45.6±44.5*,#

51.0±29.4*,#

0.861

Scaling

 

 

 

Baseline to 2 weeks

5.4±23.3

−4.8±21.4

<0.001

2 weeks to 4 weeks

16.7±28.0*

29.6±19.1*

<0.001

Baseline to 4 weeks

22.1±35.0*,#

24.8±21.2*,#

0.698

Erythema

 

 

 

Baseline to 2 weeks

15.4±31.0

17.3±27.5

0.449

2 weeks to 4 weeks

16.9±22.7

15.6±18.3

0.386

Baseline to 4 weeks

32.3±38.6*,#

32.9±25.9*,#

0.372

Within?group comparison *P<0.05 as compared to the baseline to 2 weeks,  #P<0.05 as compared to 2?4 weeks. SD=Standard deviation

  • Tolerability and compliance to the drug were similar in both the groups
  • Mild adverse effects such as gastrointestinal upset, headache, and taste disturbances were observed which were comparable in both the groups

Conclusions

  • Itraconazole demonstrated higher clinical and mycological cure rates as compared to terbinafine.
  • Itraconazole seems to be superior to terbinafine in the treatment of tinea corporis and tinea cruris

Reference

Indian J Pharmacol 2019;51:116-9.