SOLO1 Trial Subgroup Analysis: Maintenance Olaparib Efficacy in BRCA-Mutated Advanced Ovarian Cancer
calendar
28 Mar, 25

 

Introduction

Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor has  showed efficacy across various tumor types including advanced ovarian cancer (OC), breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. The SOLO1 phase III trial  demonstrated a significant enhancement in progression-free survival (PFS) for newly diagnosed advanced OC patients receiving maintenance olaparib compared to placebo.

Aim

The study aims to assess the efficacy of olaparib by analyzing PFS in relation to specific baseline characteristics, including surgical status, response to platinum-based chemotherapy, stage III disease with no gross residuals post-surgery, and BRCA mutation status.

Patient Profile

Patients with newly diagnosed BRCA1- and/or BRCA2 -mutated advanced ovarian cancer

Methods

  • After completion of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, 391 patients were randomly assigned 2:1
    • maintenance olaparib tablets (n=260) (300 mg twice daily)
    • Placebo (n=131)
  • PFS subgroup analyses of SOLO1 included clinical response after platinum-based chemotherapy (complete [CR] or partial response [PR]), surgery type (upfront orinterval surgery), disease status after surgery (residual or no gross residual disease), and BRCA mutation status ( BRCA1or BRCA2).

Study endpoint

  • Primary endpoint:PFS in patients with stage III disease who underwent upfront surgery and had no gross residual disease
  • Secondary endpoint: ORR (modified RECIST) was a secondary end point evaluated in women with radiologic evidence of disease at baseline

Results

  • Median treatment duration was 24.6 months in Olaparib arm and 13.9 months for placebo
  • The PFS advantage associated with olaparib was observed across all subgroups, regardless of the timing of surgery, residual disease status post-surgery, response to platinum-based chemotherapy (complete response or partial response), or type of BRCA mutation.

Figure 1: Percentage reduction in risk of disease progression/death with olaparib compared with placebo based on surgery timing and residual macroscopic disease status disease status

Figure 2:  Percentage reduction in risk of disease progression/death with Olaparib compared to placebo with  response after platinum-based chemotherapy at baseline, and BRCA mutation status

Table 1 : Progression-free survival (PFS) for subgroup analyses

Subgroups

Olaparib

Placebo

HR

Surgery timing

 

 

 

Patients undergoing upfront

Surgery

Not reached

15.3

0.31

Patients undergoing interval surgery

33.6

9.8

0.37

Residual macroscopic disease status

 

 

 

Patients with residual disease

after surgery

29.4

11.3

0.44

Patients with no gross residual disease

after surgery

NR

15.3

0.33

Patients with stage III disease

underwent upfront surgery and had no gross

residual macroscopic disease after surgery

NR

21.9

0.32

Response after platinum-based chemotherapy

 

 

 

Clinical CR

NR

15.3

0.34

Women with a PR

30.9

8.4

0.31

BRCA mutation status

 

 

 

BRCA 1 mutation

41.4

13.8

0.41

BRCA 2 mutation

NR

13.8

0.20

CR, complete response; PR, partial response

Figure 3: Proportion of patient progression free at 1 , 2 and 3 yrs based on  surgery timing

Figure 4 : Proportion of patient progression free at 1 , 2 and 3 yrs based on  residual macroscopic disease status

Figure 5 : Percentages of patient progression free based on  response after platinum Based chemotherapy at baseline

Figure 6 :  Proportion of patients progression free at 1 , 2 and 3 yrs based on   BRCA Mutation status

Objective response

In women with evidence of disease at baseline, nearly twice as many had an objective response while receiving olaparib maintenance (43%) compared with placebo (23%)

Table 2 : Best Objective Response in women with Radiologic evidence at disease at Baseline

 

Olaparib

Placebo

Objective response

23 (42.6)

6 (23.1)

CR

15 (27.8)

3 (11.5)

PR

8 (14.8)

3 (11.5)

SD > 12 weeks

26 (48.1)

13 (50.0)

PD

4 (7.4)

7 (26.9)

NE

1 (1.9)

0

CR, complete response; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease

Conclusion

  • Maintenance therapy with olaparib demonstrated a significant PFS advantage in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer possessing a BRCA mutation.
  • The findings indicate that, irrespective of baseline surgical and chemotherapy outcomes or the specific type of BRCA mutation, patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC are at a high risk of disease progression and derive benefit from maintenance treatment with olaparib.

Reference

J Clin Oncol 38:3528-3537