TORCH (Towards A Revolution in COPD Health) Study
calendar
29 Sep, 11

TORCH
Towards a Revolution in Copd Health

TORCH : A Landmark Study

  • First Pharmacological intervention to show evidence in impacting mortality after LTOT and smoking cessation
  • Large study population (n ∼ 6,000 )
  • Results reconfirm the role of ICS in severe COPD

Primary Objective

  • The effect of SFC 50/500 µg vs placebo on all-cause mortality over 3 years in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD

Secondary Objectives

  • The effect of SFC 50/500 ?g on the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations
  • The effect of SFC 50/500 ?g on quality of life (SGRQ)

Study Design

Results: Mortality

Results: Exacerbations

Quality of Life Over 3 Years

Patients receiving SFC had better quality of life (SGRQ total score) at the end of the study than at the beginning

Rate of Decline in Lung Function Over 3 Years

SFC significantly reduced the rate of decline in lung function compared with placebo (39 mL/year vs 55 mL/year, difference 16 mL/year p<0.001)
”...SFC decreas[ed] the excess FEV1 decline attributable to COPD by approximately half.”
“...halving the excess decline in FEV1 is likely to be clinically important...”

Error bars represent 5% and 95% confidence intervals

The Mortality Benefit with SFC vs Placebo is Supported by Significant Improvements in the Three Pillars of Clinical Management of COPD

TORCH: Conclusions

  • TORCH is the first study to show a potential survival benefit of pharmacotherapy in COPD patients (with p=0.052 for SFC vs. placebo in terms of all cause mortality at 3 years)
  • In addition, SFC also decreased exacerbations and improved lung function and improved and sustained quality of life over three years
  • These were accompanied by a reduction in the rate of decline in lung function in patients taking SFC compared with placebo demonstrating an effect on disease progression
  • These results demonstrate the clinical efficacy of SFC 50/500 ?g bd in patients with FEV1<60% predicted.

References

1. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:775-89
2. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178:332–338